In the previous posting, we studied how to calculate limit of a rational function (Corollary 3). Let us state it here again:
Corollary 3. [Limit of a Rational Function] Let p(x) and q(x) be two polynomials. Then for any real number b, \lim_{x\to b}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}=\frac{p(b)}{q(b)} provided q(b)\ne 0.
But what if q(b)=0? To answer this question let us take a look at the following example.
Example. Find the limit \displaystyle\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{x^2+3x+2}{x^2-x-2}.
Solution. Let p(x)=x^2+3x+2 and q(x)=x^2-x-2. Then p(-1)=0 and q(-1)=0. Since q(-1)=0, we cannot use Corollary 3 to calculate the limit. So what do we do? Note that p(-1)=0 and q(-1)=0 means that both p(x) and q(x) contains a power of (x+1) in them. Let us factor out the maximum common power of (x+1) from p(x) and q(x). Since x\to -1, x\ne -1 i.e. x+1\ne 0. So we can cancel the maximum common power of (x+1) and then calculate limit of the resulting function as x\to -1: \begin{eqnarray*}\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{x^2+3x+2}{x^2-x-2}&=&\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{(x+1)(x+2)}{(x-2)(x+1)}\\&=&\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{x+2}{x-2}\ \mbox{since \(x\ne -1\)}\\&=&-\frac{1}{3}.\end{eqnarray*}
Remark. [Indeterminate Form] In the above example, \frac{\displaystyle\lim_{x\to -1}(x^2+3x+2)}{\displaystyle\lim_{x\to -1}(x^2-x-2)}=\frac{0}{0}. What is this? and how do we understand it? It turns out that the quantity \frac{0}{0} is not undefined but something else. Remember that here 0 is not a number but an infinitesimal, a state that is extremely close to the number 0. The quantity \frac{0}{0} is called an indeterminate form. There are other types of indeterminate forms, to name a few, \frac{\infty}{\infty}, 0\cdot\infty, 0^0, etc. We will study them later. There are four possibilities for the value of an indeterminate form: 0, \pm\infty, or a non-zero real number. Although we denote infinitesimals by the same symbol 0, some infinitesimals dominate others. For instance, consider the limit of a rational function \displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}. Suppose that \displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}p(x)=\lim_{x\to a}q(x)=0. There can be three possible scenarios then:
- If p(x) approaches 0 way faster than q(x) does, then \displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}=0.
- If q(x) approaches 0 way faster than p(x) does, then \displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}=\pm\infty.
- If p(x) and q(x) approaches 0 at about the same rate (speed), then \displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)} may be a non-zero real number.
Example. Find the limit \lim_{x\to 2}\frac{4-x^2}{3-\sqrt{x^2+5}}.
Solution. \displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}(4-x^2)=\lim_{x\to 2}(3-\sqrt{x^2+5})=0. This means that both the numerator and the denominator have a power of x-2 as a common factor. As we did in the previous example, we would attempt to factor both the numerator and the denominator. Only problem is that the denominator is not a polynomial and we don’t know how to factor it. Well, we learned about rationalizing the denominator in algebra. We multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate 3+\sqrt{x^2+5} of the denominator. More specifically,\begin{eqnarray*}\lim_{x\to 2}\frac{4-x^2}{3-\sqrt{x^2+5}}&=&\lim_{x\to 2}\frac{4-x^2}{3-\sqrt{x^2+5}}\cdot\frac{3+\sqrt{x^2+5}}{3+\sqrt{x^2+5}}\\&=&\lim_{x\to 2}\frac{(4-x^2)(3+\sqrt{x^2+5})}{4-x^2}\\&=&\lim_{x\to 2}(3+\sqrt{x^2+5})\\&=&6.\end{eqnarray*}
I got a little confused on #16 on page 66.
Find the lim cotx as x->╥-
Can anyone help me? I have no idea where to start.
Luke,
\begin{eqnarray*}\lim_{x\to\pi-}\cot x&=&\lim_{x\to\pi-}\frac{\cos x}{\sin x}\\&=&\frac{\cos\pi}{\sin\pi}\\&=&\frac{-1}{0}\\&=&-\infty.\end{eqnarray*}
One may wonder why \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\pi-}\cot x, why not \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\pi}\cot x. The reason is that \displaystyle\lim_{x\to\pi-}\cot x\ne\lim_{x\to\pi+}\cot x. The difference between the values of these two limits comes from the following limits:
\begin{eqnarray*}\lim_{x\to\pi -}\frac{1}{\sin x}&=&\frac{1}{0+}\\&=&\infty,\\\lim_{x\to\pi +}\frac{1}{\sin x}&=&\frac{1}{0-}\\&=&-\infty.\end{eqnarray*} In order to see why this is so, please refer to the graph of y=\sin x. Consequently, \lim_{x\to\pi -}\cot x=-\infty,\ \lim_{x\to\pi +}\cot x=\infty.
If the limit is for example 0/0, with polynomial equations then there is a common factor between the numerator and denominator. When you factor the equations the limit should be able to be solved.
You only rationalize the denominator with its conjugate when a radical is present.
so in that example when the denominator is multiplied by the conjugate you get:
3 – sq(x^2 + 5) * 3 + sq(x^2-5) =
9 – x^2 -5 =
4 -x^2
which can then be factored from the numerator.
actually, i got a little crossed with my signs…it should be:
3 – sqrt(X^2 + 5) * 3 + sqrt(x^2 +5) =
9 – (x^2 + 5) =
9 – x^2 – 5 =
4 – x^2
then factor that from the numerator.
Guys,
I am really glad that you are talking math to each other!
Jay, nice job with explaining the calculation! Please keep up with that. The only problem I see is missing parentheses. The above should be read as
\begin{eqnarray*} \left(3 – \sqrt{x^2 + 5}\right)\left( 3 +\sqrt{x^2 +5}\right) &=&3^2-\left(\sqrt{x^2+5}\right)^2\\&=&9-(x^2+5)\\&=&4-x^2.\end{eqnarray*}
Could you explain how when you multiply the denominator by the conjugate you end up with (4-x^2)?
Also, in the above example, I am not following or understanding how the (4-x^2) e in the numerator of the problem gets cancel out the problem when we rationalized the denominator.
Ok, I see where I have possibly made a mistake on the quiz taken this past Friday. Each time a limit’s solution turn out to be the “indeterminate form” is it correct to say that numerator and denominator have a common factor? Is it also correct to always rationalize the denominator by the conjugate to receive a numerical value for the limit? Thus, the limit will not be the “indeterminate form” but more so a number.