How to Calculate Limits II

In the previous posting, we studied how to calculate limit of a rational function (Corollary 3). Let us state it here again:

Corollary 3. [Limit of a Rational Function] Let \(p(x)\) and \(q(x)\) be two polynomials. Then for any real number \(b\), \[\lim_{x\to b}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}=\frac{p(b)}{q(b)}\] provided \(q(b)\ne 0\).

But what if \(q(b)=0\)? To answer this question let us take a look at the following example.

Example. Find the limit \(\displaystyle\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{x^2+3x+2}{x^2-x-2}\).

Solution. Let \(p(x)=x^2+3x+2\) and \(q(x)=x^2-x-2\). Then \(p(-1)=0\) and \(q(-1)=0\). Since \(q(-1)=0\), we cannot use Corollary 3 to calculate the limit. So what do we do? Note that \(p(-1)=0\) and \(q(-1)=0\) means that both \(p(x)\) and \(q(x)\) contains a power of \((x+1)\) in them. Let us factor out the maximum common power of \((x+1)\) from \(p(x)\) and \(q(x)\). Since \(x\to -1\), \(x\ne -1\) i.e. \(x+1\ne 0\). So we can cancel the maximum common power of \((x+1)\) and then calculate limit of the resulting function as \(x\to -1\): \begin{eqnarray*}\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{x^2+3x+2}{x^2-x-2}&=&\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{(x+1)(x+2)}{(x-2)(x+1)}\\&=&\lim_{x\to -1}\frac{x+2}{x-2}\ \mbox{since \(x\ne -1\)}\\&=&-\frac{1}{3}.\end{eqnarray*}

Remark. [Indeterminate Form] In the above example, \[\frac{\displaystyle\lim_{x\to -1}(x^2+3x+2)}{\displaystyle\lim_{x\to -1}(x^2-x-2)}=\frac{0}{0}.\] What is this? and how do we understand it? It turns out that the quantity \(\frac{0}{0}\) is not undefined but something else. Remember that here \(0\) is not a number but an infinitesimal, a state that is extremely close to the number \(0\). The quantity \(\frac{0}{0}\) is called an indeterminate form. There are other types of indeterminate forms, to name a few, \(\frac{\infty}{\infty}\), \(0\cdot\infty\), \(0^0\), etc. We will study them later. There are four possibilities for the value of an indeterminate form: \(0\), \(\pm\infty\), or a non-zero real number. Although we denote infinitesimals by the same symbol \(0\), some infinitesimals dominate others. For instance, consider the limit of a rational function \(\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}\). Suppose that \(\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}p(x)=\lim_{x\to a}q(x)=0\). There can be three possible scenarios then:

  1. If \(p(x)\) approaches \(0\) way faster than \(q(x)\) does, then \(\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}=0\).
  2. If \(q(x)\) approaches \(0\) way faster than \(p(x)\) does, then \(\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}=\pm\infty\).
  3. If \(p(x)\) and \(q(x)\) approaches \(0\) at about the same rate (speed), then \(\displaystyle\lim_{x\to a}\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}\) may be a non-zero real number.

Example. Find the limit \[\lim_{x\to 2}\frac{4-x^2}{3-\sqrt{x^2+5}}.\]

Solution. \(\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}(4-x^2)=\lim_{x\to 2}(3-\sqrt{x^2+5})=0\). This means that both the numerator and the denominator have a power of \(x-2\) as a common factor. As we did in the previous example, we would attempt to factor both the numerator and the denominator. Only problem is that the denominator is not a polynomial and we don’t know how to factor it. Well, we learned about rationalizing the denominator in algebra. We multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate \(3+\sqrt{x^2+5}\) of the denominator. More specifically,\begin{eqnarray*}\lim_{x\to 2}\frac{4-x^2}{3-\sqrt{x^2+5}}&=&\lim_{x\to 2}\frac{4-x^2}{3-\sqrt{x^2+5}}\cdot\frac{3+\sqrt{x^2+5}}{3+\sqrt{x^2+5}}\\&=&\lim_{x\to 2}\frac{(4-x^2)(3+\sqrt{x^2+5})}{4-x^2}\\&=&\lim_{x\to 2}(3+\sqrt{x^2+5})\\&=&6.\end{eqnarray*}

9 thoughts on “How to Calculate Limits II

  1. jevans

    I got a little confused on #16 on page 66.

    Find the lim cotx as x->╥-

    Can anyone help me? I have no idea where to start.

    Reply
    1. lee Post author

      Luke,

      \begin{eqnarray*}\lim_{x\to\pi-}\cot x&=&\lim_{x\to\pi-}\frac{\cos x}{\sin x}\\&=&\frac{\cos\pi}{\sin\pi}\\&=&\frac{-1}{0}\\&=&-\infty.\end{eqnarray*}

      Reply
      1. lee Post author

        One may wonder why $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\pi-}\cot x$, why not $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\pi}\cot x$. The reason is that $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\pi-}\cot x\ne\lim_{x\to\pi+}\cot x$. The difference between the values of these two limits comes from the following limits:
        \begin{eqnarray*}\lim_{x\to\pi -}\frac{1}{\sin x}&=&\frac{1}{0+}\\&=&\infty,\\\lim_{x\to\pi +}\frac{1}{\sin x}&=&\frac{1}{0-}\\&=&-\infty.\end{eqnarray*} In order to see why this is so, please refer to the graph of $y=\sin x$. Consequently, $$\lim_{x\to\pi -}\cot x=-\infty,\ \lim_{x\to\pi +}\cot x=\infty.$$

        Reply
  2. Jay Dieterich

    If the limit is for example 0/0, with polynomial equations then there is a common factor between the numerator and denominator. When you factor the equations the limit should be able to be solved.

    You only rationalize the denominator with its conjugate when a radical is present.

    so in that example when the denominator is multiplied by the conjugate you get:

    3 – sq(x^2 + 5) * 3 + sq(x^2-5) =
    9 – x^2 -5 =
    4 -x^2

    which can then be factored from the numerator.

    Reply
    1. Jay Dieterich

      actually, i got a little crossed with my signs…it should be:

      3 – sqrt(X^2 + 5) * 3 + sqrt(x^2 +5) =
      9 – (x^2 + 5) =
      9 – x^2 – 5 =
      4 – x^2

      then factor that from the numerator.

      Reply
      1. lee Post author

        Guys,
        I am really glad that you are talking math to each other!
        Jay, nice job with explaining the calculation! Please keep up with that. The only problem I see is missing parentheses. The above should be read as
        \begin{eqnarray*}
        \left(3 – \sqrt{x^2 + 5}\right)\left( 3 +\sqrt{x^2 +5}\right) &=&3^2-\left(\sqrt{x^2+5}\right)^2\\&=&9-(x^2+5)\\&=&4-x^2.\end{eqnarray*}

        Reply
  3. JKeyes

    Also, in the above example, I am not following or understanding how the (4-x^2) e in the numerator of the problem gets cancel out the problem when we rationalized the denominator.

    Reply
  4. JKeyes

    Ok, I see where I have possibly made a mistake on the quiz taken this past Friday. Each time a limit’s solution turn out to be the “indeterminate form” is it correct to say that numerator and denominator have a common factor? Is it also correct to always rationalize the denominator by the conjugate to receive a numerical value for the limit? Thus, the limit will not be the “indeterminate form” but more so a number.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *